Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Lynette, Stuff about me...
Melon Midget |
Oct 12 2009, 04:41 AM
|
B Cup
Group: Members
Posts: 419
Joined: 7-July 08
Member No.: 27,212
|
QUOTE(paybarraman @ Oct 12 2009, 01:01 AM) After what GWB and his cronies did to the economy over 8 years, you expect this president to turn things around in 100 days?!?!!? Be happy you can still vacation in Bora Bora.... Very well stated...
|
|
|
|
Lynette |
Oct 16 2009, 01:25 PM
|
D Cup
Group: Members
Posts: 1,489
Joined: 25-February 06
Member No.: 13,700
|
QUOTE(paybarraman @ Oct 12 2009, 02:01 AM) After what GWB and his cronies did to the economy over 8 years, you expect this president to turn things around in 100 days?!?!!? Be happy you can still vacation in Bora Bora.... Very well stated, however I doubt we can place all the blame on any one president. Most of the time they're totally at the mercy of their respective congress and magority. It would be ignorant to assume that George Bush didn't inherit an economy from Bill Clinton that was already in free-fall mode due to all the distractions caused by his China policies as well as his extra marital escapades. The final two years of the Clinton administration's term were a disaster in many ways, but if you do your homework, you'll see that there were many factors leading to the decline of the econimoc boom of the 90's. Both political parties in this country have been infiltrated by groups of self-serving, ingenuous, fat-cat politicians, who have been forced (by the current system) to give much more consideration to special interests than to the people. In a country whose credo is " for and by the people", the entire political landscape's become somewhat of a joke. Until the day comes where entering politics doesn't directly translate to "getting rich", we'll be seeing a lot more corruption in Washington on both sides of the isle.
|
|
|
|
johnny wadd |
Oct 16 2009, 01:43 PM
|
C Cup
Group: Members
Posts: 870
Joined: 17-January 06
Member No.: 12,859
|
QUOTE(Lynette @ Oct 16 2009, 02:25 PM) Very well stated, however I doubt we can place all the blame on any one president. Most of the time they're totally at the mercy of their respective congress and magority. It would be ignorant to assume that George Bush didn't inherit an economy from Bill Clinton that was already in free-fall mode due to all the distractions caused by his China policies as well as his extra marital escapades. The final two years of the Clinton administration's term were a disaster in many ways, but if you do your homework, you'll see that there were many factors leading to the decline of the econimoc boom of the 90's. Both political parties in this country have been infiltrated by groups of self-serving, ingenuous, fat-cat politicians, who have been forced (by the current system) to give much more consideration to special interests than to the people. In a country whose credo is " for and by the people", the entire political landscape's become somewhat of a joke. Until the day comes where entering politics doesn't directly translate to "getting rich", we'll be seeing a lot more corruption in Washington on both sides of the isle. Ditto!
--------------------
|
|
|
|
ddd35 |
Oct 16 2009, 05:09 PM
|
Melon Master
Group: Members
Posts: 28,815
Joined: 7-April 06
From: Peoria, Illinois
Member No.: 14,606
|
QUOTE(Lynette @ Oct 16 2009, 11:25 AM) Very well stated, however I doubt we can place all the blame on any one president. Most of the time they're totally at the mercy of their respective congress and magority. It would be ignorant to assume that George Bush didn't inherit an economy from Bill Clinton that was already in free-fall mode due to all the distractions caused by his China policies as well as his extra marital escapades. The final two years of the Clinton administration's term were a disaster in many ways, but if you do your homework, you'll see that there were many factors leading to the decline of the econimoc boom of the 90's. Both political parties in this country have been infiltrated by groups of self-serving, ingenuous, fat-cat politicians, who have been forced (by the current system) to give much more consideration to special interests than to the people. In a country whose credo is " for and by the people", the entire political landscape's become somewhat of a joke. Until the day comes where entering politics doesn't directly translate to "getting rich", we'll be seeing a lot more corruption in Washington on both sides of the isle. Less politics , More boobs ..LOL
|
|
|
|
Lynette |
Oct 22 2009, 02:57 PM
|
D Cup
Group: Members
Posts: 1,489
Joined: 25-February 06
Member No.: 13,700
|
QUOTE(paybarraman @ Oct 12 2009, 02:01 AM) After what GWB and his cronies did to the economy over 8 years, you expect this president to turn things around in 100 days?!?!!? Be happy you can still vacation in Bora Bora.... No, actually I don't. I doubt anyone in their right mind would go there. But, other presidents have accomplished much more in their first 100 days than this one, and HE'S got a huge advantage with the current congress being democratically controlled. Don't get me wrong, I'm not bashing the guy. I'm just trying to figure out why he hasen't been able to get the things he said he'd do done by now. Axlerod staqted that there would be HUGE changes and results within the new administration's first six months, and that the president would "unite" the congress. Sorry, I don't see ANY of that happening. Now, one to another subject... The day the government orders me not to make X amount of money because I'm paying myself too much, or my companies are doing too well... I'll be leaving for Tahiti permanently. The idea that the government can restrict an individual's ambition to achieve as much as they're capable of is BS. Look out Steve Jobs and Bill Gates.
|
|
|
|
johnny wadd |
Oct 22 2009, 03:40 PM
|
C Cup
Group: Members
Posts: 870
Joined: 17-January 06
Member No.: 12,859
|
QUOTE(Lynette @ Oct 22 2009, 03:57 PM) No, actually I don't. I doubt anyone in their right mind would go there. But, other presidents have accomplished much more in their first 100 days than this one, and HE'S got a huge advantage with the current congress being democratically controlled. Don't get me wrong, I'm not bashing the guy. I'm just trying to figure out why he hasen't been able to get the things he said he'd do done by now. Axlerod staqted that there would be HUGE changes and results within the new administration's first six months, and that the president would "unite" the congress. Sorry, I don't see ANY of that happening. Now, one to another subject... The day the government orders me not to make X amount of money because I'm paying myself too much, or my companies are doing too well... I'll be leaving for Tahiti permanently. The idea that the government can restrict an individual's ambition to achieve as much as they're capable of is BS. Look out Steve Jobs and Bill Gates. Its not a good sign when the Liberal Saturday Night Live starts making fun of Him having done nothing.
--------------------
|
|
|
|
Melon Midget |
Oct 22 2009, 04:41 PM
|
B Cup
Group: Members
Posts: 419
Joined: 7-July 08
Member No.: 27,212
|
QUOTE(Lynette @ Oct 22 2009, 01:57 PM) No, actually I don't. I doubt anyone in their right mind would go there. But, other presidents have accomplished much more in their first 100 days than this one, and HE'S got a huge advantage with the current congress being democratically controlled. Don't get me wrong, I'm not bashing the guy. I'm just trying to figure out why he hasen't been able to get the things he said he'd do done by now. Axlerod staqted that there would be HUGE changes and results within the new administration's first six months, and that the president would "unite" the congress. Sorry, I don't see ANY of that happening. Now, one to another subject... The day the government orders me not to make X amount of money because I'm paying myself too much, or my companies are doing too well... I'll be leaving for Tahiti permanently. The idea that the government can restrict an individual's ambition to achieve as much as they're capable of is BS. Look out Steve Jobs and Bill Gates. Enough political crap. Bring on the Boobies!!!
|
|
|
|
Lynette |
Oct 28 2009, 12:48 PM
|
D Cup
Group: Members
Posts: 1,489
Joined: 25-February 06
Member No.: 13,700
|
[B][COLOR=purple]Ya know, I've been thinking a lot about "what is sexy?" lately. I've been going thru a lot of pictures and ones other people have taken of me. My conclusion is that "side boob" or "lobe" is VERY sexy. I'm not sure that a "Side Boob" thread would be any good here though. Seems like most men only wanna see everything, both tits, areola, nipple, the works. I'd start a "side boob" thread, but not sure how far it would go. What do ya'll think? BTW, Here's one that a friend took a couple of months ago while four of us were in Mexico together. I think it's sexy, but I'm starting to doubt that what I think is what most men think.[B][COLOR=purple]
|
|
|
|
Melon Midget |
Oct 28 2009, 12:52 PM
|
B Cup
Group: Members
Posts: 419
Joined: 7-July 08
Member No.: 27,212
|
QUOTE(Lynette @ Oct 28 2009, 11:48 AM) [B][COLOR=purple]Ya know, I've been thinking a lot about "what is sexy?" lately. I've been going thru a lot of pictures and ones other people have taken of me. My conclusion is that "side boob" or "lobe" is VERY sexy. I'm not sure that a "Side Boob" thread would be any good here though. Seems like most men only wanna see everything, both tits, areola, nipple, the works. I'd start a "side boob" thread, but not sure how far it would go. What do ya'll think? BTW, Here's one that a friend took a couple of months ago while four of us were in Mexico together. I think it's sexy, but I'm starting to doubt that what I think is what most men think. That is hot...
|
|
|
|
r8rman1 |
Oct 28 2009, 01:51 PM
|
A Cup
Group: Members
Posts: 99
Joined: 18-July 09
From: Lancaster, Pennsylvania
Member No.: 31,238
|
QUOTE(Lynette @ Oct 28 2009, 12:48 PM) [B][COLOR=purple]Ya know, I've been thinking a lot about "what is sexy?" lately. I've been going thru a lot of pictures and ones other people have taken of me. My conclusion is that "side boob" or "lobe" is VERY sexy. I'm not sure that a "Side Boob" thread would be any good here though. Seems like most men only wanna see everything, both tits, areola, nipple, the works. I'd start a "side boob" thread, but not sure how far it would go. What do ya'll think? BTW, Here's one that a friend took a couple of months ago while four of us were in Mexico together. I think it's sexy, but I'm starting to doubt that what I think is what most men think.[B][COLOR=purple] Lynette, While I def like the whole enchilada, I do like the 'tease' factor very, very much. Side boob, under boob, etc..... There is a lot to say for (and look at) those types of pics! I would love to see a thread like that be successful! And that first entry by you is an incredible start!!!! NICE!
|
|
|
|
evade20 |
Oct 28 2009, 06:47 PM
|
Melon Master
Group: Members
Posts: 21,880
Joined: 21-November 05
From: New York
Member No.: 11,658
|
QUOTE(Lynette @ Oct 28 2009, 12:48 PM) Ya know, I've been thinking a lot about "what is sexy?" lately. I've been going thru a lot of pictures and ones other people have taken of me. My conclusion is that "side boob" or "lobe" is VERY sexy. I'm not sure that a "Side Boob" thread would be any good here though. Seems like most men only wanna see everything, both tits, areola, nipple, the works. I'd start a "side boob" thread, but not sure how far it would go. What do ya'll think? BTW, Here's one that a friend took a couple of months ago while four of us were in Mexico together. I think it's sexy, but I'm starting to doubt that what I think is what most men think. Damn, Lynette, In your case this is sexy as all hell. Please start a "side boob thread." I'm sure other RMM ladies will join in... Just for the record, I did a search and did not find any other threads totally dedicated to "side boob" shots. Oh and by the way... A wonderful gesture in getting this thread going is to post at least 5 different pics of your gorgeous side boobies....
--------------------
"The single most important component of a camera is the twelve inches behind it." Ansel AdamsThe state has no business in the bedrooms of the nation. Pierre Elliott Trudeau
|
|
|
|
theinfamousjax |
Oct 28 2009, 08:41 PM
|
D Cup
Group: Members
Posts: 1,693
Joined: 25-February 09
From: New Brunswick, New Jersey
Member No.: 29,905
|
QUOTE(Lynette @ Oct 28 2009, 08:36 PM) Hmmm, you guys are probably right. After all, the "great cleavage" thread seems to have met with some success. I'll dig thru my pics and see how many there are like that. Usually I come by them through asking strangers on the beach if they'd mind e-mailing me a copy when I bust them taking photos of me when they think I'm not aware. Other times, it's people I'm with doing it, so getting my hands on the pics is easy. I'm just wondering how many women actually have this kind of photo in their collections. Maybe they'd all start taking them now specifically for the thread. What do you think? i am not sure how many women have the pics but i think more might be willing to take one because its not as revealing as the full package, but thats just my take on it
--------------------
Fuck being famous, I'd rather be infamous
|
|
|
|
kcoc72 |
Oct 28 2009, 10:06 PM
|
C Cup
Group: Members
Posts: 691
Joined: 22-December 06
From: Georgia
Member No.: 19,737
|
QUOTE(Lynette @ Oct 28 2009, 12:48 PM) [B][COLOR=purple]Ya know, I've been thinking a lot about "what is sexy?" lately. I've been going thru a lot of pictures and ones other people have taken of me. My conclusion is that "side boob" or "lobe" is VERY sexy. I'm not sure that a "Side Boob" thread would be any good here though. Seems like most men only wanna see everything, both tits, areola, nipple, the works. I'd start a "side boob" thread, but not sure how far it would go. What do ya'll think? BTW, Here's one that a friend took a couple of months ago while four of us were in Mexico together. I think it's sexy, but I'm starting to doubt that what I think is what most men think.[B][COLOR=purple] I've got to be honest...your side boob pic is pretty damn hot!! I am a big fan of the side boob pics b/c you can see what the girl has going on, but yet there is somewhat of a tease to it b/c you can't see the nipples. And when the rest of the back and hair and all are included it can make for a very sexy pic just as you have shown us!! Let the side boob pics commence!!
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
Track this topic
Receive email notification when a reply has been made to this topic and you are not active on the board.
Subscribe to this forum
Receive email notification when a new topic is posted in this forum and you are not active on the board.
Download / Print this Topic
Download this topic in different formats or view a printer friendly version.
|